I already discussed this with Evrnvrbr, CF Espanol is closed and merged into CF West. Those articles still have CF Espanol on it. When CF EU merged before that, you can see in almost all articles it doesn't say CF Europe but instead CF West, that never happened for CF Espanol's articles. My idea was to do a strikethrough and still list both CF Europe and Espanol and do (Merged) after the version name but other articles had already did what Evrnvrbr is doing which is remove CF Espanol or Europe and just list CF West for all 3. My reasoning was to document (like a wiki does) what version had that weapon first. I think we should wait until a Admin or mod to decide.
@Evrnvrbr Remember that there are certain stuff exclusive to certain servers so we can't just "destroy" their existence just because they merged into another version. For example,several maps were only ever presented in CF Korea (PMAG) or the Octane WS that were only available in CF Europe
For the 2 AK's, Knapy1997 did the edit, but for the Barrett, Rydeeniss did it. So it wasn't just 1 person doing it.
This isn't a witch hunt, just asking. Should we re-add CF Europe and CF Espanol with a strikethrough and still have CF West or just say CF West?
In all honesty I'm just laying out the proper way we format the article, otherwise the admins really don't have enough time to moderate the Wikia so there's always a chance that new members who aren't aware of it will do these edits. As a Moderator, you are free to revert these edits and maybe explain to them, because this isn't actually stated in the Article Format guideline so it's understandable that people made this mistake.
But in what form should we preserve the information that those versions merged to an specific one? Cause, imagine if another merge happens in the future and a "new" CF is born, in what way should we edit the merged versions to make that it doesn't really seems that confusing?
Evrnvrbr wrote: But in what form should we preserve the information that those versions merged to an specific one? Cause, imagine if another merge happens in the future and a "new" CF is born, in what way should we edit the merged versions to make that it doesn't really seems that confusing?
The infobox at the mainpage should already tell us about migration, so having strikethrough on the article itself should be fine. We acknowledged the legacy servers before merging as a way to keep track of exclusivity, hence why strikethrough are used.